You are not logged in [login] | [register]
RSS MAD is both an RSS feed archive and online feed reader.
You can browse our categories, search for a feed, or if you already have a URL, use our online feed reader.
Simply start browsing the site, and if you find some feeds you like, register to view them on your own personalized page!
you are here: home » business » advertising & marketing
Searching 176708 articles in 8938 feeds.
Do you like RSS MAD? Why not spread the news and tell a friend about it - it's as easy as filling out this form!
added: Wed, 28th September 2005 | 466 views | 0x in favourites
feed url: http://www.conversationmarketing.com/index.xml
Conversation Marketing: Intelligent Internet Marketing Strategies
I have strived (striven? striveded?) for years to write the perfect blog post. I think I finally have it. Here goes (ahem):
Introduction involving cute puppy, family member, description of recent travels or new toy.
Synergy. Web 2.0 internet conversations branding. Branding conversations web 2.0 XML hyperlinking dynamic community.
Twitter.
Facebook social media 3.0 mashup, ROI analytics and metrics to leverage marketing. Blogging RSS web 4.0. Dry humor here hahahaha. Google is on a mission to possess our very souls. Yahoo! sucks. Microsoft joke hahahahahahhaha.
Steve Jobs is cool. Guy Kawasaki quote here. Steve Ballmer chair-throwing reference. Reference to 2008 presidential campaign.
Analogy to current events that is so tenuous it stretches the very fabric of space and time. Unsubstantiated rumors and claims. Obligatory grammar bad. A typo or too.
Web 5.0!. Shining epiphany!
Flattering other bloggers link.
Desperate plea for comments, bookmarks, Stumbles and Diggs.
Attempt at friendly goodbye.
Toodles!
[I get paid if you buy a copy - full disclosure. It's a dang good book though.]
When someone tells me that, to improve my e-mail marketing, I need to "write more compelling content", my first impulse is to hit them with something heavy and unforgiving. These kinds of vague pronouncements are like telling me I can lose weight by eating less and exercising more.
Marketing Sherpa has mastered the art of not doing that, which is why I am an unabashed Sherpa fanboy. I love their books.
Their 2009 Email Marketing Benchmark Guide is no exception.
It's chart geek heaven, with hundreds of images showing you what works and what doesn't, heatmaps showing you where folks look and click in e-mails and case studies.
A new addition, though, is their 12-Point Plan to improve e-mail marketing. It's a very cool step-by-step for getting more out of your newsletter, special offers or whatever else you're using.
Some details include:
This may have been in last year's guide, but if it was, I was too far into a Vicodin-induced haze to remember it.
I'll warn you: It's pricey: At $397 a copy it might cause palpitations. But we made that back on a single mailing to a 1,000-member list.
So, if you want a great e-mail marketing encyclopedia that gives you real, actionable advice (gasp), buy this book:
OK, a few of you are gluttons for punishment. You asked me to give you some details as to how I researched and wrote my SEO 2009: Adapt or Die piece. Here are the basics.
I subscribe to a Google blog search for "Google Patent", and scour the news that I read.
I also go search the US Patent Office for Google-related patents.
In this case, I saw a patent from 2005 some time ago regarding information retrieval based on historical data. It generated a lot of interest a while back because it showed that Google was starting to use domain age as an indicator of quality. What really got my spidey-sense tingling, though, was this bit of information in the patent:
36. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more types of history data includes information relating to user behavior associated with documents; and wherein the generating a score includes: determining user behavior associated with the document, and scoring the document based, at least in part, on the user behavior associated with the document.37. The method of claim 36, wherein the user behavior relates to at least one of a number of times that the document is selected within a set of search results and an amount of time that one or more users spend accessing the document...
...47. The method of claim 45, wherein the scoring the document includes: analyzing the user maintained or generated data over time to identify at least one of trends to add or remove the document, a rate at which the document is added to or removed from the user maintained or generated data, and whether the document is added to, deleted from, or accessed through the user maintained or generated data, and scoring the document based, at least in part, on a result of the analyzing.
In English, this means Google's going to track the percentage of time spent on n pages visited where 'n' is the number of documents they click from the Google search results. It also means Google is looking at bookmarking, social voting, SearchWiki, Google Notebook and who-knows-what-else to get a clue as to which web pages matter and which don't.
That's a profound shift from the days when links, site structure and keyword density were all that mattered.
So, the patents seemed to point to a shift towards behavioral ranking. But I graduated from law school with a B- average, so I never trust my interpretation of legal documents. I need a bit more.
This part isn't exact. Marketing never is. Sorry.
I launched, nearly simultaneously, three test sites. I can't tell you what they are because I don't want to wreck my sites' rankings - they're legit sites. I just used them as experiments.
Site A was an application that let folks compare how their car performs next to others. It's nearly uncrawlable, except for a few generic information pages.
Site B was just plain silly. It's only one page.
Site C was a pure keyword-sniping site. A blog built for one purpose: To get a top ranking for a juicy key phrase. But it's loaded with great content.
All three sites targeted keywords with nearly-equal competition, both in number of competing pages and apparent level of optimization.
Site C jumped up in the rankings within a few weeks. It was super keyword-relevant. It attracted links, too. But average time on site for my target keyword was under 1 minute, and the bounce rate was over 80%. Site C yo-yo's up and down in the rankings and has yet to stabilize, in spite of continued writing.
Site B got a ton of links and mentions and generated some buzz. But it had almost zero content. For months it didn't rank. But it did average over 2 minutes time on site for my target keyword, and a very low bounce rate of 30% for that keyword. After a couple months it gained a top 3 ranking and has stayed there ever since. I haven't updated the site since.
Site A got lots of traffic for a short time, and has since tailed off to almost nothing. It has, however, maintained a time on site for my target keyword of over 2 minutes, and a low 30% bounce rate. It gained a high ranking very quickly and has stayed there. I've not touched the site since I launched it.
None of them won. They all finished about even, with decent rankings for target phrases and equal percentage of available traffic.
Which made no sense at all. If you're banking on the traditional hallmarks of good SEO, site C should've won: It had more content, the same link authority and the best keyword targeting.
How did a dinky little one-page site with almost no content (site B) and a few links keep up? The only way it outperformed site C was bounce rate and time on site for my target keyword.
The same held true for site A. It looks awful in every way, except that time on site and bounce rate for my target keyword was nearly 3x better than for site C.
Such as they are:
So, there you have it. My unscientific seat-of-the-pants test, plus patent analysis. Go take an aspirin and send me your comments in the morning.
PS: I wrote this after eating, in a 5 hour period: Smoked bacon with black-eyed peas, Wonton soup, edamame, shredded sesame beef and then a chocolate souffle. With 3 beers. All because my wife is a terrible influence. Attractive, smart and my better half, but a terrible, terrible influence. It's amazing I'm still alive, much less writing. So be kind in your critique.

There's a meteor headed our way. Plug your ears, sing LALALALALALA all you want. It won't change a thing.
Google's about to make search engine optimization (SEO) into marketing, for good. How? They've been slowly adding user behavior to their ranking algorithm. Bet on far bigger changes after January 1st.
I won't go into the many painful technical details of how I've arrived at this conclusion. If you want to know, Twitter me and I'll cheerfully bore you to extinction.
Here's what's you need to know:
The organic click-thru rate (CTR) is going to affect rankings more than before. In English, 'organic CTR' is the percentage of people who click on your unpaid search listing versus those who see it and don't click. So, if 10 people search for 'rubber baby buggy bumpers', and 5 click on your listing, then you have a 50% organic CTR:
A higher organic CTR will tell Google you're more relevant and authoritative for that search query.
Time on site after search (TOSAS - you heard it here first) is the amount of time someone spends on your web site after they click on an unpaid Google search results. The amount of time folks spend on your site after clicking a Google search result is also more and more important:
I've been tracking organic search traffic for client web sites over the last year. Sites with improved time on site saw improved organic search traffic within months of their improved time on site. During that time, those sites weren't conducting any SEO and saw no improvement in link popularity. Their content wasn't stale, but they weren't writing their brains out, either. All 5 sites were 1-2 years old. The only thing they improved? Usability. Time on site.
Don't start whining that this isn't SEO. It is now. Get used to it.
This one's been evident for a while: Search engines are also adding bookmarking, stumbles, Diggs and other information into the equation. If you can get more folks to add your site to their Google Notebook, or promote it to the top of Google Searchwiki, or bookmark your site on Del.icio.us, then yeah, your ranking's going to probably improve a bit.
Bruce Clay may have gone a bit far when he said rankings are dead. They're maimed, but definitely still alive.
But rankings don't matter. They are, at most, a means to an end. And with personalized search, rankings will be harder and harder to consistently track. Instead, track:
It's harder to fake behavioral triggers. You can bookmark the hell out of your site, of course, but that's not going to be enough to tilt the algorithm in your favor. You're going to have to (gasp) deliver real value to your audience.
However, the first company to hire 1000 people around the world to all carefully click, browse, bookmark and otherwise generate apparently legitimate traffic to a site will probably prompt the major search engines to once again tweak their algorithms, adding some new ranking factor, and ruining it for the rest of us.
If you're an SEO professional or The Person Who Got Stuck With SEO, you'd better add a few skills to your tool belt:
Yeah, no.
Search engines still care about content, link authority, visibility and the like. They're just adding these behavioral hallmarks to the equation.
Plus, if you write crappy content or just never update your site, visitors will click through to the site, then bounce back to Google, lowering your TOSAS and killing your rankings.
So it's still about the content.
While researching this post, I spent a lot of time poring over Google patent applications. The best plain English description of the patent that caught my interest (and a few other people's), is SEOMOZ's nifty explanation.
I also read a whole bunch of different forum threads where lots of smart people were discussing comments made by Bruce Clay about the death of rankings. The best thread I found was on the Cre8asite Forums.
And, I plumbed the depths of my extremely messed up, travel- and kid-addled head. So don't be a lemming: Read what I've written, check your own assumptions, and then let me know what you find. I'll pull those findings together here.
This article is only about Google, but trust me, it applies to every major search engine. If you think Yahoo! and Live won't immediately race to match Google feature-for-feature, you're insane.
You've got your site all set up at a nice, shiny new domain name. Chances are, though, you're losing visitors. And link authority.
Why? Because typos abound, and you're not catching them. Here's how you can grab a lot of traffic that you may be missing right now, and build better link authority, too:
First off, reserve domains that may be typos or different interpretations of your domain. If your web address is 'www.yourdomain.com', reserve:
Obviously, you could end up spending $10,000 on typo domains, so you need to apply a little sanity test: I tend to focus on typos I've seen other people make.
Once you have those domains reserved, 301 redirect them to your primary domain.
If you're not sure what a 301 redirect is, check with your web hosting provider.
Next, set up a catch-all for your domain, so that if someone types:
...they're 301-redirected to 'www.yourdomain.com'.
I personally make the 'ww.yourdomain.com' error at least 20 times a day. Set that up and I'll write nice things about you.
Take a few minutes to set these up and two things happen:
Happiness abounds!
By the way, I've personally only implemented maybe 1 out of these 5-6 things on my own sites. So before you start leaving gloating comments, consider me chastised.
"How much do I need to write if I want to be #1?"
I hear that question a lot. The short answer is: "As much as gets you there. Not one word more."
But I do have some basic rules of thumb.
They're basic. Very basic.
So I decided to write 'em down, and have some fun with Google Knol, at the same time:
The simple criteria I set out in the article has worked well for me over the years. But people still look at me like I'm a moron when I bring it up. So feel free to review, curse, comment on how stupid I am, etc. on Knol, for all the world to see.
Related Articles
SEO Copywriting 101: Search Engines Ain't That Smart
A Copywriter's Guide to Semantic Markup
A Copywriter's Guide to Linking
And of course my E-book on SEO Copywriting
Just an FYI: MarketingSherpa is having a 30% off sale on all their books, including the Landing Page Handbook and the E-mail Benchmarks Guide.
Have a Look Here
Their books are pretty pricey but worth every penny. At 30% off it's definitely worth a look.
Yes, I finally wrote '2.0' on my blog without referring to violence. We had a real, honest-to-goodness blizzard last night, with snow drifts and stuff:
After having a bit of success with my 11 Internet Marketing Trends to Ignore in 2008, I thought I'd give it another shot.
My only totally incorrect predictions from 2008: E-books are catching on, and podcasts now capture a .002% audience, not .00001%. My bad.
This is NOT investment advice! As always, I take no responsibility for the accuracy of these predictions. Note that my stock portfolio has lost at least 50% of its value in the last 12 months.
So, you're working hard on SEO. You want that higher ranking. Rankings rankings! Nothing else matters!
Then, suddenly, your organic traffic is going up, but your sales aren't.

You could fire your SEO firm. Clearly your search engine optimization efforts are a flop. I mean, all they did was generate more traffic, right?
Or, you could consider other possibilities and address them:
You're getting more traffic but not more sales. That means your site sucks.
Sorry, but it's true. Unless your SEO pro is a total moron, they picked the right keywords. Your site's failing to generate sales because people don't like what they see when they get there.
Check your referring keywords report. If the keywords are relevant but they're not generating sales, something is turning people away.
Time to dig deeper.
Ideally, put goal funnel tracking in place in your cart so you can see if people are abandoning you during checkout. Nail down the problem and address it.
If you can't, though, follow this checklist for your cart:

If your developer says they can't make these changes, or even tries to bill you for it after swearing they could build a great site for you, slap them. When they fall down, kick them. When they stop crying, tell them to fix the damned site. Anyone who tells you they're an internet marketer or site designer should know better. None of this stuff is rocket science. If they don't, it's time they learned.
If someone's coming to your site from a search engine, there's a good chance they're landing on a product page. Make sure your product page is eassssssy to read:

Does your home page make it clear you're an online store, with products and prices and stuff? Seriously, does it? If it doesn't, and I land there after a search for 'Radio Flyer Wagons', I'm probably gonna leave.
Do you have decent quality description tags for each page on your site? Does each page have a clear, descriptive title tag? If not, a lot of people may be coming to your site under incorrect assumptions. Remember, those tags show up in your search listing.
Does your site have a decent quality onsite search tool? How else am I going to find stuff?
Do you have analytics in place, so you know where folks come from, when they buy, and when they leave? You need that data if you're going to improve.
At some point, you may have to face the painful truth: Your site isn't getting it done. If so, you can rebuild. That costs money, like a lot of businesses.
You can make changes, which costs money, like a lot of businesses.
Or you can hang onto what you first built, ignore your customers and just hope that 100,000 visitors will fix what 1,000 couldn't.
It's your choice.

Search engines are cool, but they aren't that bright. They don't know that you meant 'car' when you typed 'vehicle'.
If you've just spent 3 hours digging through a thesaurus, finding every alternative for 'shoes', start over. Burn the thesaurus. Think about the words that people use to find you.
Then, as a revolutionary new internet marketing strategy, actually write those words in your copy.
You'll get more traffic.
You'll get more sales/leads/whatever.
You may need to find the right keywords, first. I wrote about keyword selection in this article, and did a how presentation about the subject here. Plus I wrote a whole seo copywriting ebook on the subject.
That's actually the lesson for the day. The rest of this post is a meandering rant about the same topic, over and over. I'm emulating 75% of the blogosphere in hopes that my ad revenues will go up.
Many moons ago, I did some copywriting for company. Let's call them Jane's Web Tools. Jane, the owner, had written her home page copy, and it read like this:
"Edit your personal online space, then forward it to your friends. Put your photographs, videos and personal notes into an web-powered album for them to enjoy."
I've changed the names, business and keywords to protect the innocent.
Of course, Jane was selling a blogging tool. Everyone searching for her searched for 'blogging tool' or 'personal blogging tool'.
She'd fallen victim to synonym diarrhea. Somewhere in grammar school, our teachers tell us to never use the same word twice in a paragraph. If you want to be the next Herman Melville, the key is to master the language and provide a veritable cornucopia of different words that all mean the same thing. Why call something a 'shoe' when you can call it 'footwear'?
Cough.
My first copywriting run generated something like this:
"Create your own customizable blog. Then add your own photographs, video and even audio files. Your friends will love it!"
We went through the same exercise throughout her site.
Her traffic went up. So did her conversions. She threw out her thesaurus.
Use the keywords people use to find you.
footwear shoes
cycle bicycle
vessel sailboat
Get the idea?
I'm not suggesting you repeat the same keyword over and over. You have to use some judgment, and your sense as a copywriter.
Nor am I suggesting you use keywords purely for the search engines. There's no such thing as 'picking keywords for search engines'. Search engines don't spend their evenings and time off browsing the web on their own. People use keywords to find stuff. So, use the right keywords, and the rest will follow.
Nor am I suggesting that you start counting the number of occurrences of 'buggy bumpers' in your copy.
But you can emphasize the keywords and concepts that your audience will really use to find you.
'Emphasize' means:
'nuff said.
This post might just get me fired. Some client somewhere will read it and be horribly offended that their behavior drives me crazy.
To them, I can only say: My kids drive me crazy, too. But I've stayed up all night with them when they're sick, driven them to the emergency room, helped them learn to read, add, multiply and to play Lego Star Wars. They're smart, just like you. They're sophisticated, just like you. And while I might not jump in front of a speeding car for you, I will do everything in my power to help you succeed.
Wear your ability to drive me to distraction as a badge of honor. I like you. I'm passionate about your products. But I'm sending you to sit on the stairs for 10 minutes.
You just hired me three weeks ago to manage a product launch, a political campaign or what-have-you. You want my team to run multiple social media campaigns, an SEO campaign and analyze the results. When we talked, I may have pointed out 50-100 times repeatedly that we're looking at a long-term, 3-6 month commitment, minimum.
Yet there you are, a week later, telling me we have to produce results Right Now Dammit or we're fired.
Internet marketing takes time. Not much time. In the Bad Old Days you'd spend months and tens of thousands of dollars shooting a TV spot, then cross your fingers that it worked. Now, you roll out your campaign in a few weeks and start collecting data right away.
But it still takes time. I'm not ignoring you, neglecting your campaign or somehow failing you. We are hard at work. Be a little patient. Just a bit.
We've been optimizing your site for 6 months. You've got lots of new content, some quality links and your organic site traffic has gone up 50%.
It just drives you nuts, though, that you don't rank number 1 for that one phrase.
The truth is, I probably have no idea why that site outranks you. Google won't tell me. I can analyze backlinks, review content and check their site all day long. It could be that Google favors sites with 'S' in their address over sites with 'G' in their address. I have no idea.
What I do know: If we keep adding quality content, keep your site visible and stick to the plan, success is inevitable. I'm way too obnoxious to lie, so trust me.
Your CMS is broken. Your development team says it'll take 2 months to change your title tags. You don't have any budget for link work or PPC. And you won't let me launch a blog or another site.
So, Ian, what else can you do?
I can remain upright on a bicycle without moving. I can also recite most of The Raven from memory. And beat 4 people simultaneously at Starcraft.
However, I can't help you with your internet marketing campaign unless you're willing to take ownership. Fire your developers, no matter how much it scares you. Get a new CMS. Pull it all up by the roots and start over if you must. Sometimes change hurts, a lot, and I know you have enough problems without me coming in and playing the pouty consultant. But we internet marketers have your best interests at heart. Listen to us. A little. Once in a while. OK?
You just found a neat new gadget that will let visitors spin your product around on your site, zoom in on the minutest detail and then custom-order it.
It's cool! I agree!
But I think we'd better:
I agree - I think it's a great tool. But you have to set priorities. Sales should be your first priority. Not coolness.
Too be honest, it ain't us. You hired someone else to build your site, another company to design your landing pages, another company to write your copy and then tacked us on to buy PPC ads.
I know it made financial sense, but you've got too many cooks. And frankly, most of them are stirring the soup with their hands because they don't know any better.
Fire us, and everyone else. Start over with a single, competent team that can pull it all together. You'll be better off in the end.
I sincerely, really do like all of my clients. I don't work with people I don't like. That's the benefit of working 15 hour days for 14 years - I get to choose.
I also know you're smart. That's why it sometimes drives me a little loopy when you stick your finger in the internet marketing outlet. Ask me next time, before you do, OK?
I pondered whether to publish this for about 2 hours after I wrote it. I finally did, figuring most of my clients know I'm totally insane anyway, and will likely ignore this entire post. I'm backing away now, sloooowwwllly...
Search engines have dominated the internet scene for at least 10 years now. And there's still only one totally reliable way to gain quality rankings that will truly last: Content.
You can build links, send out press releases, spam blog comments and attempt to game the search algorithms to your heart's content. None of it matters if you have a 5-page web site.
Sites with lots of quality content continue to dominate the rankings. Sites without crawlable text content continue to struggle.
Most important, search engines still base their rankings primarily on the text they find on your site.
So make sure that:
Case in point: One of our clients has consistently added 2-3 new articles per week to their web site. They've been in the top 5 for their industry's most competitive terms for over 2 years. While their rankings may bounce up and down, they stay in that top 5 range. The constant growth in onsite content helps them maintain those rankings.
Content still matters. It will probably matter 20 years from now. So don't neglect your site's copywriting while dedicating hours or days to your site's design. You need to balance your time and make sure your site content gets the attention it deserves.
The recording of my SEMPDX web analytics presentation, "From Google Analytics to Business Analytics", is now available:
[warning - navel gazing ahead]
Why the hell am I in marketing?
When I started college, my plan was to do ROTC and become a pilot.
Then I because a History major and decided to go to law school so I could Save The World.
Then I graduated from Law School and realized I'd be one of the worst lawyers in history.
After a few more years of drifting about, I landed first in copywriting, then in marketing copywriting, then in marketing. Then the internet turned out not to be a fad, and here I am.
So I'm not saving the world. The economy is crashing, the world's screwed up, and I'm helping people decide what to buy. I have a receding hairline, a suburban house, a family car and 10 extra pounds. I'm a sellout! Augh!!!!
Or am I?
Good marketing helps people make the right choice when they're deciding on everything from toilet paper to their next President. I work to market products I like and support, and causes I can get behind. You do, too. If you help one of those products succeed, you're making the world a tad better.
Or, you can just hawk whatever comes your way, collect your check, and go home.
Why did you go into marketing?
Next week I'll be releasing another e-book. This one will cover web analytics for business.
It's going to use the same format as my SEO Copywriting e-book: Short, very high-level, only the essentials, and really cheap.
This goes along with the webinar I'm doing with SEMPDX.
I'll also be offering a bunch of free copies to folks who want 'em. Follow me on Twitter (@portentint if you'd like to be in on the freebies...
I'll be presenting a webinar today:
Transforming Google Analytics Into Business Analytics
When: Tuesday, December 9, 12 PM PST (that's today)
Where: Here, on the web, silly
The focus: Making actual, real-life use of Google Analytics to grow your business. No fancy shtuff like advanced segments. I'll talk about:
Note: This is not a Google Analytics training webinar. It's a business analytics webinar. So I won't be going over setting up e-commerce tracking or other tech stuff. This one's for the analysts and marketers out there.
I'll also have Q&A at the end.
I'm a developer. There, I've said it. I'm out of the closet.
It's a little known fact, but I've been coding web applications since 1995. I used the very first version of ColdFusion (on 1,000 floppy disks), learned PHP while building Prius Mileage and have even (gasp) muddled through Ruby. While object-oriented programming still makes my medulla ache, my geek credentials are intact.
I learned internet marketing as a long-suffering copywriter and a developer at the same time.
So, here are my tips for developers trying to function in the marketing world:
First, marketers never make sense. Don't even try to understand their talk about personas and keywords and the long tail. They're from Laterra, you're from Arbre. Instead, focus on the things that you can influence:
Follow these tips and congratulations! You're on the marketing team. Martinis at noon...
Internet marketing isn't mysterious. It's the writing, stupid.
This is a collection of random thoughts about writing, prompted by someone telling me today that "all you know how to do is write". They were attempting to reduce my price for an SEO project. You inspired me! Cheers!

K, this writing therapy session is now over.
Someone really did tell me that today. Someday I will become rich by inventing a way to pinch people's noses via the internet.
So, Sears, you didn't expect a lot of people on your web site today, the biggest single shopping day of the year?
A few minutes later, we saw this:
Target is up. So is JCPenney, Costco, Walmart, etc.. Too bad for Sears...
SEO widows, you know who you are: Your spouse/significant other comes home with a twinkle in their eye because they just "fixed a major spider trap" or "discovered a new component of the Google TrustRank algorithm". Then they leave for a week to go to some conference, and you get to hear about their drunken exploits on 451 different social media outlets.
Worst of all, you have no idea what to get them for the holidays. What the hell do you buy for someone when their greatest thrill is attracting links from .org domains?
Well, I'm here to help. As a 'high-functioning geek', I can bridge the gap between the Normal and the SERP-obsessed. Here are my picks for great gifts, in no particular order:
Just wrapped up my Conversational Marketing Summit presentation titled 'why does most marketing suck?'.
In it, I review:
I also answer several specific questions about social media, PPC and the like.
Here's the recording:
You can also see it at full size: Click here.
I'm presenting at a webinar tomorrow: The Conversational Marketing Summit.
My presentation is entitled "Why Does Most Marketing Suck?"
A good time will be had by all. I'm on at 4 PM PST tomorrow, 11/24 (Monday).
You can sign up here
The Elite Retreat is almost totally booked.
With speakers like Jeremy Schoemaker, Neil Patel and Gary Vaynerchuk, you'll want to be there.
Just FYI: They embargo blogging about the details of the event (from what I understand) so if you're hoping I'm going to write lots of cool stuff to teach you everything, you're out of luck.
Note: The following story is what we call character development. Feel free to skip to 'Lessons in Internet Marketing' if you don't like hearing about people who did even dumber things than you did as a kid.
When I was 14 or so, I jumped off the roof of my house. Holding a sheet over my head. As a parachute. This proves conclusively that teenagers should be locked up in small cages until their raging hormones allow more oxygen to their brains.
I'd assumed, of course, that the sheet would go FUMP and let me drop gently to the ground, victorious before my friends.
Instead, the sheet went PHHHBBTTTTTT and I crashed into the juniper bushes. I was miraculously uninjured. This proves conclusively that teenagers should have their luck bottled up for use later on in life.
My parents apparently had no idea what'd happened until 2 years ago, when my son tattled on me at Thanksgiving dinner.
I'm going somewhere with this.

I made two mistakes and learned two important lessons that day:
The Crowd Is Rarely Right. First, just because your equally hormone-addled friends say "Ian, you should jump off the roof! It'll be so kewl!" doesn't mean you should. And, just because 400,000 other people think it's worthwhile to:
...doesn't mean you should do it. Even in marketing, following a lot of smart people doing stupid things doesn't make you smart. It makes you a smart person doing something stupid.
Things That Look Easy Rarely Are. I was SHOCKED that my Sears Twin Fitted Bedsheet didn't work as a parachute. What the hell?! The principle looked so easy. Building a website, making it work, building traffic to it and making it perform as a real, profitable business center may look easy. I mean, who can't buy a copy of Dreamweaver and slap something together? Trust me: You're using a bedsheet as a parachute. Hire a professional, or at least talk to one, or go to something like the Elite Retreat and learn from the best.
As I plummeted earthward, I distinctly heard my friends laughing hysterically. Even as I crunched into the dry and extremely scratchy juniper bushes, I heard the 'thump' as they fell over in helpless gales of laughter. Apparently, they'd guessed that gravity would defeat cheap cotton any day of the week, and that the 10-foot drop wasn't enough time to make the best parachute on earth save you. They were just looking for a laugh. Jerks.
Amateur internet marketers (and pros) do really stupid things all the time. We They always feel better when another marketer does something even more stupid. So yeah, they'll nudge you towards that $10/click mark, and tell you not to 'waste money' on professional internet marketing help.
Go buy a cheap bedsheet. Put it under your desk. Whenever you're about to spend $10,000 on a banner ad, or invest $10/click to advertise a $5 product, or build a site that 'attracts eyeballs', look at that sheet.
Do you want to be as stupid as I was? Didn't think so.
Did you know I just published an e-book? Well, I did: The Unscary, Real World Guide to SEO Copywriting. Have a look.
SEO still lives and dies based on good copywriting. If you're going to move up in the rankings and stay there, you have to know how to write customer- and search engine-friendly content.
But you're a writer. You shouldn't have to learn about SEO, keyword mining, pagerank and the robots meta tag. You just want to write quality copy that search engines will like.
That's why I wrote The Unscary, Real World Guide to SEO Copywriting. In it, you'll find:
The book's short, sweet and to the point: 30 pages, 6 rules for better SEO copywriting.
You can get it now. It costs $5. That's, what, one really lousy lunch?
You'll receive an e-mail with a download link within a few minutes.
At least, take everything they say with a grain of salt.
Today, they came out with their 'SEO Starter Guide'. I downloaded it and took a quick look.
And I've finally lost patience. So here I go on a Graywolf-style rant:
On page 6 they say "Improve the structure of your URLs". The authors point at URLs that have lots of dross like 'mysite.com/folder1/1089257/x1/0000002a.htm' and say that's not user friendly. They're right. What they don't say is that this URL is clearly dynamically generated. No sane human being would create a page address like that.
A professional SEO will always recommend keyword-relevant, clickworthy URLs like 'mysite.com/bicycles/schwinn/mountain-bikes.htm' instead.
To create that more friendly URL, you'd have to rewrite the dynamic URL using some kind of URL rewriting tool like mod_rewrite.
So, Google's recommending you rewrite dynamic URLs. Fine. As an SEO, I'll always suggest that if it's possible, and if it won't kill already strong rankings.
But, this statement is a direct contradiction of their post just 6 weeks ago, though, they were very specific in stating you should not rewrite dynamic URLs.
And of course, that post was a change in their previous policy.
K guys, I've tried to stick up for you on this while you flop back and forth on the dynamic URL question like a fish slowly dying on the bottom of a boat. But I've had it. Pick a damned policy and stick with it, or stop trying to pretend you have one.
Google doesn't talk about your page's semantic outline. They mention headings, but ignore paragraph tags, lists and other structural elements that are critical to successful SEO.
They ignore the importance of content clustering and hub pages. Instead they provide a one-paragraph example of a content outline that, if used by any site of reasonable size, will result in 99% of your content being buried deeper than George Bush's popularity rating.
They also ignore blended search, semantic relationships between different terms, any discussion of pagerank, the potential damage caused by Flash or AJAX, the importance of standards compliance or how to display products on a page.
None of these items are essential to basic SEO. So strictly speaking, I guess Google's guide is just fine. Sort of like knowing half the flight manual is 'just fine'.
Google's guide doesn't say anything horrifying (except where they contradict their own policies, but I already covered that). But many beginners will download it, read it and think they're set. And they aren't. Implying this guide is an introduction to SEO is dangerous. It might be a very high-level introduction to basic principles of site building. Maybe.
But an intro to SEO? If you believe that, I've got a bailout package for ya.
Google is a private entity. They are a large group of brilliant people who've made one of the best search engines on earth. They deserve a lot of props for that, which I regularly deliver.
But they do not have your best interests at heart. I'm not implying some kind of conspiracy - Google's a business. They have their best interests at heart. As they should.
They do offer great advice on selecting an SEO, which makes sense: A good SEO will help them sort out their rankings, which will bring happier searchers. That then generates more clicks they can sell via Adwords.
But SEO advice? I don't think so...
End of rant.
Why do internet marketers need to understand segmentation? So they don't act like airlines, of course.
That was my topic last night at the SEMPDX Hotseat. I just uploaded my slides, with backup text, to SlideShare. I provide a walkthrough of Google Analytics' new Advanced Segments feature, as well as my thoughts on checked baggage fees:
Enjoy...
Blogs are the new web sites. Marketers launch 'em because they think they need 'em. They don't consider the time commitment required, goals or why their audience would want to hear from them.
Then the blog dangles off the corporate site like an appendix until it irritates someone in the organization, at which point it's removed.

It's a shame, because blogs can do a lot for your business:
So make the most of business blogging. Follow a few rules and you'll have a business blog that actually helps you grow online:



This post is part of a four-post series by myself, Marcelo Calbucci, Carolynn Duncan and Scot Herrick. Read their excellent pieces:
Finding Your Blogging Voice by Marcelo Calbucci
Setting up your Blog by Carolynn Duncan
Blogging for your Career by Scot Herrick
I'm speaking at the SEMPDX Hotseat tomorrow night at 6:30. The topic: Web Analytics - Do you know what you're looking at?
More important, my co-panelist is Eric Peterson of Web Analytics Demystified fame.
I will have just driven for 4 hours.
He will have just driven for 10 minutes.
Come see just how looped I can get on caffeine while driving the I-5 corridor. It's worth it...
I'm sure Dino Rossi is sitting somewhere right now, wondering why he lost this election. After all, he was up against some dang tax-and-spend liberal.
It might have something to do with his marketing strategy. He used these signs quite a bit during the campaign:
It's a clever message: Teach all those damned Seattle elitists a lesson. It might have worked in Wenatchee, or Spokane.
Problem is, he put them up in Seattle.
Yes, you read right. I'm a Seattle elitist myself. I passed one of these signs driving over the West Seattle Bridge today.
Rule number one in political marketing: Don't insult your supporters, or your competitor's. These signs were the equivalent of Rossi himself standing in downtown Seattle giving passersby the finger. They were not well-received. Cough.
So, Dino, next time around, hire a smarter campaign staff. Or a marketer or two. Or at least endeavor to not insult one of the biggest voting populations in your state.
Photo from Hal Mueller's blog. Thanks!!!!!

Internet marketing is not safe. No marketing is.
It's risky because:
It doesn't matter. You still have to do it. You have to take risks, and risk being wrong, if you're going to get it right once in a while.
So, a few suggestions for all you folks who ask me things like "Can you guarantee you'll triple my sales?" and "How do I know it'll work?":
The End.
It's a momentous day, so instead of blathering on about marketing, here's a few handy links for tracking the polls and the news around today's election:
Slate's hour-by-hour guide to the election is a good run-down of what's going to happen when.
Polltrack has tons of maps, graphs and data for all you numbers geeks.
I've always liked CNN's poll tracker, too.
Electoral-vote.com is my favorite for their averaging of data across many polls. They'll be liveblogging tonight.
What links are you going to follow?
Update: I'm going! See you there!
Jeremy Schoemaker and his gang of internet marketing geeks just opened their second annual Elite Retreat for registration. It's expensive. Really expensive. So expensive that if you have to ask, you may as well move on. But it's the best dollars you can spend, because:
But hey, don't take my word for it. I'm working out how I can go myself. If you don't sign up, that leaves a spot for me.
Oh, yeah, I didn't mention that. They only enroll 35 people.
Learn more about the Elite Retreat and sign up before all the seats are gone: Click here.
Every now and then I let folks know the various places you can follow or connect with me online. I'm working on consolidating a bit, so here are the current online places I hang out:
LinkedIn.com/in/ianlurie
Twitter.com/Portentint
Facebook
Follow/connect and I'll follow back. I'm always up for a good conversation.
I recommend the death penalty for plagiarism. Until that happy day arrives, I'll share a technique that at least makes life harder for thieving scumbags.
First, you need to add a trap to your blog post. Usually that means an invisible GIF image. Use your image editing software to create a 10x10 pixel image that matches the background of your blog or that's transparent.
Insert that into your blog somewhere where no one will notice. Use the absolute address for the image. So:
http://www.conversationmarketing.com/images/trap.gif
instead of just
images/trap.gif
Don't include a height or width attribute.
Save your blog post. You now have a hidden image in your post that, if someone cuts-and-pastes the content, will get transferred to their blog. And the image will still be stored on your server.
If you replace the image with something else, the new image will show up, full size, on the thief's blog.
A few days later, copy one sentence from your blog post.
Put it in quotes.
Then paste it into Google and find other blogs that have the same text. In this example, I found one genuine copycat who was also stupid enough to keep my GIF image, and keep it linking to my server:

If I replace trap.gif on my server with another image, it'll show up on his or her blog. Mwahahahahaha....
Since this genius copied this post word-for-word, they also copied the trap image. And, they copied the image, which is still being loaded from your server.
Remove the trap.gif image from your post - you don't want whatever you create showing up on your blog, after all.
Then replace trap.gif on your server with anything you want. The result:
Weeee. You can, of course, use any image you want. I had something far worse in there at first, but removed it because I realized my son might read it.
Keep stealing my content if you want. I will keep finding new ways to mess with you and your blogs. Yes, you can always find a way to work around it. But is it worth it?
Did you know I just published an e-book? Well, I did: The Unscary, Real World Guide to SEO Copywriting. Have a look.
Portent Interactive is now hiring: Portent's Seeking SEO Interns
Don't know who the smartass was that wrote that post...

Yo, copywriters. If you freak out about semantic markup, then you have varying degrees of apoplexy over links. But linking is a critical part of smart online copy. Links are why it's called the world wide web, and not the world wide collection of random disconnected bits and pieces.
So you need to learn. Here's a quick tutorial from me, a one-time marketing copywriter. This doesn't go into a lot of theory - it's strictly step-by-step.
This article is just about internal links - the links you create from one page on your site to another page on your site. If you're nice, I might do another one about external links.
First, the basics:
I'll explain each of these as we go through the steps for creating useful links in your blog or web site.
You just finished your article. It's ready to publish. Now, where are you going to point that link (or those links)?
Find an article, product or other content on your site that's either related to your new content, provides an opposing viewpoint, or supports your assertions. If you can't find anything, fire yourself. The next writer will figure it out, I'm sure.
K, found the article? Open it in your browser, if you haven't already. Now, in your browser's address bar, select the entire address of that page:

Click "Edit>Copy". That copies the page address (URL) to your clipboard.
Paste that somewhere - anywhere. A text editor will do. You just don't want to lose it if your computer crashes, or if you pound your fists bloody on your keyboard after reading this article.
Now you need to figure out where, and how, you're going to link to that page. Sometimes it's easy: Last week I wrote a piece about semantic markup for copywriters. So, if you look at the first paragraph of this article, you'll see that I created a link to that article right there.
A few good tips for link text: